| Case ID |
2e54e2b3-03c1-47bc-aab1-271ed899a805 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Appeal No.3-L of 2016 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 17, 2024 |
| Hearing Date |
Apr 17, 2024 |
| Decision |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan allowed the appeal filed by the Inspector General of Police, Punjab, and others, setting aside the order of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated March 4, 2015. The Court found that the claim of Respondent No. 1 for proforma promotion was incorrect, as he was not junior to the petitioners. It emphasized the necessity of completing the required training courses for promotion, as mandated by Rule 19.25 of the Police Rules, 1934. The Court underscored that promotion should be based on completed training and institutional capacity building rather than litigation. The decision aimed to uphold the integrity of the police force and ensure adherence to established rules and regulations. |
| Summary |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan ruled on a civil appeal concerning the promotion of police officers under the Police Rules, 1934. The case involved Waris Ali, who sought proforma promotion to the ranks of Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI) and Sub-Inspector (SI) based on the promotion dates of his juniors. The Court determined that the promotion process must adhere strictly to Rule 19.25, which requires police officers to complete specific training courses to qualify for advancement. The ruling highlighted the importance of training and capacity building within the police force, emphasizing that promotions should not be influenced by legal disputes. This decision is crucial for maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of law enforcement in Pakistan. The Court's judgment aims to foster a disciplined and capable police force that prioritizes training over litigation, ensuring that officers are equipped with the necessary skills for their roles. The ruling serves as a precedent for future cases regarding police promotions and the interpretation of service rules. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Punjab Service Tribunal,
Inspector General of Police, Punjab
|
| Judges |
Muhammad Ali Mazhar,
Ayesha A. Malik,
Irfan Saadat Khan
|
| Lawyers |
Barrister M. Mumtaz Malik,
Ms. Rubina,
Zafar Hussain Ahmad
|
| Petitioners |
The Inspector General of Police, Punjab and others
|
| Respondents |
Waris Ali (deceased) through LRs and others
|
| Citations |
2024 SLD 4368,
2024 SLD 883
|
| Other Citations |
Syed Hammad Nabi v. Inspector General of Police 2023 SCMR 584,
Muhammad Amjad v. The Director General, Quetta Development Authority 2022 SCMR 797,
Kashif Aftab Ahmed Abbasi v. Federation of Pakistan 2022 SCMR 1618,
Naveed Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan 2012 SCMR 1133
|
| Laws Involved |
Police Rules, 1934
|
| Sections |
19.25
|