| Case ID |
2c2f13e0-6813-4d08-8511-22fe2e8cc92f |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Revision No. 1713 of 2006 |
| Decision Date |
Sep 09, 2008 |
| Hearing Date |
Sep 09, 2008 |
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts, finding no material irregularities or misreadings in the evidence presented. The pivotal document, a gift deed, was examined thoroughly, and the courts concluded that there were significant contradictions in the testimonies of the plaintiff's witnesses. The court ruled that the petitioner did not have complete possession of the property and that the alleged gift was incomplete. As a result, the revision petition was dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. |
| Summary |
In the case of MST. GHULAM ZOHRA vs. REHMAT ALI, the Lahore High Court dealt with a civil revision concerning the Specific Relief Act, 1877. The petitioner claimed possession of a property based on a gift deed but faced dismissal from both the trial and appellate courts due to contradictions in witness testimonies and incomplete possession. The court emphasized the importance of thorough evidence appraisal, ultimately dismissing the revision petition. This case highlights the significance of clarity in property transfer and the necessity for complete documentation in legal disputes over ownership. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
SYED ASGHAR HAIDER
|
| Lawyers |
Ch. Sadaqat Ali,
Gohar Nawaz Sandhu
|
| Petitioners |
MST. GHULAM ZOHRA
|
| Respondents |
REHMAT ALI
|
| Citations |
2009 SLD 761,
2009 MLD 224
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Specific Relief Act, 1877
|
| Sections |
8,
42
|