| Case ID |
2b6c76f0-e4f9-4755-9a22-aa1dc0731af5 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 869 OF 1975 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 17, 1978 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Tribunal's decision to disallow the deduction of bad debts was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. The Tribunal failed to adequately consider the facts presented by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), particularly regarding the financial state of the company from which the debt was claimed. The Tribunal had relied on a proposed scheme of creditors without establishing its validity or adoption, leading to the conclusion that the debt was not irrecoverable. The case emphasizes the necessity for the Tribunal to consider all relevant evidence before making a determination on the recoverability of debts claimed as bad under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. |
| Summary |
In the case of Ram Nath Mehrotra v. Commissioner of Income tax, the Allahabad High Court addressed the issue of bad debts under section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appellant, Ram Nath Mehrotra, a registered firm engaged in money-lending, advanced a substantial sum to M/s. Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd. The firm claimed deductions for bad debts for the assessment years 1969-70 and 1970-71, which were initially disallowed by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) but later allowed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC). The Tribunal reversed this decision, citing a proposed creditor scheme that suggested potential recovery of the debt. However, the High Court found that the Tribunal had overlooked critical evidence presented by the AAC, including the company's dire financial status and the fact that no payments had been made towards the debt. The court emphasized the importance of a thorough examination of all facts and evidence in determining the status of bad debts. The case illustrates the judicial scrutiny required in tax assessments and the need for tax authorities to consider the practical realities of debt recovery. As such, it serves as a crucial precedent for similar tax cases, ensuring that the interests of justice are upheld in financial disputes. |
| Court |
Allahabad High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
M/s. Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd.
|
| Judges |
Satish Chandra, C.J.,
M.B. Farooqi, J.
|
| Lawyers |
A.N. Mahajan,
Ashok Gupta
|
| Petitioners |
Ram Nath Mehrotra
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Income tax
|
| Citations |
1979 SLD 897,
(1979) 117 ITR 714
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Greaves Cotton & Co. Ltd. [1968] 68 ITR 200 (SC),
B. Muniappa Gounder v. CIT [1976] 102 ITR 787 (Mad.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
36(1)(vii)
|