Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 2b0687c7-edb7-4660-86b2-ea529e3bfaed
Body View case body.
Case Number Appeal No. 730 of 2006
Decision Date Jun 29, 2006
Hearing Date
Decision The appeal was accepted, and the previous orders regarding the punishment were set aside. The Service Tribunal found that there was no sufficient documentary evidence to justify the decision to dispense with the inquiry. The appellant was found not guilty of the misconduct charged against him. The Tribunal noted that the punishment of reduction in rank was inappropriate given the circumstances and the absence of ulterior motives. The case highlighted the importance of thorough investigation protocols and adherence to legal standards in disciplinary actions against police officers.
Summary In this case, appeal No. 730 of 2006, the Service Tribunal of Punjab addressed the misconduct allegations against Inspector Muhammad Amir. The case revolved around the improper handling of a registration and investigation of a case involving allegations of Zina. The Tribunal concluded that the punishment of reducing the appellant's rank was unjustified due to lack of evidence supporting the claims of negligence. The decision emphasized the need for compliance with section 156-B of the Criminal Procedure Code, which restricts certain investigations to officers of a specified rank. This case underscores the critical balance between disciplinary actions and legal standards within police conduct. The outcome serves as a reminder of the necessity for proper inquiry processes in administrative matters, particularly in cases involving serious allegations against law enforcement personnel.
Court Service Tribunal, Punjab
Entities Involved Not available
Judges AZAD MUHAMMAD AWAN
Lawyers Mr. Nasir Hussain Shah
Petitioners INSPECTOR MUHAMMAD AMIR
Respondents INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Citations 2007 SLD 3530, 2007 PLJ 67
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Criminal Procedure Code, 1898
Sections 156-B