| Case ID |
2aba6786-0abe-4e42-96b3-cc00f4a33d79 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Revision No. 2634 of 2011 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 11, 2012 |
| Hearing Date |
Dec 11, 2012 |
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court allowed the civil revisions filed by the petitioners, ruling that the findings of the two lower courts were based on misreading and non-reading of evidence. The court set aside the judgments and decrees of the lower courts, declaring the suit filed by the respondent (Muhammad Ramzan) dismissed and the suit filed by the petitioners (Muhammad Din and others) decreed in their favor with costs. The court emphasized the validity of the agreement to sell and the evidence presented by the petitioners, stating that the lower courts had committed illegality and material irregularity in their findings. |
| Summary |
In the case of Civil Revision No. 2634 of 2011, the Lahore High Court addressed a dispute involving a suit for declaration relating to a property exchange. The case involved the petitioners, Muhammad Din and others, who challenged the concurrent findings of two lower courts that had ruled in favor of the respondent, Muhammad Ramzan. The petitioners argued that the lower courts misread evidence regarding an agreement to sell and a mutation of property. The High Court, upon review, found that the agreement to sell was validly executed and supported by documentary evidence, including receipts for payment. The court ruled that the lower courts had erred in their judgments by ignoring the established principles of law and the substantial evidence presented. This decision highlights the importance of accurate evidence interpretation in property disputes and the limitations of lower courts when faced with clear documentation supporting the petitioners' claims. Key trending keywords in this context include 'property law', 'civil revision', 'court decisions', 'legal evidence', and 'Lahore High Court'. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, J
|
| Lawyers |
Danish Ahmad Mukarram for Petitioners,
Ch. Javed Rasool for Respondents
|
| Petitioners |
MUHAMMAD DIN and others
|
| Respondents |
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN through L. Rs. and others
|
| Citations |
2013 SLD 2717,
2013 YLR 1709
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877),
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
|
| Sections |
42,
115
|