| Case ID |
269a15b7-4a1e-4ca0-b699-3471e2da8b81 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D-2741 of 2016 |
| Decision Date |
Jan 01, 1949 |
| Hearing Date |
Dec 31, 1948 |
| Decision |
The case involved critical considerations regarding the interpretation of legal provisions, which ultimately led to the court's ruling. The decision emphasized the necessity for clarity in legal statutes and the implications of such clarity for future cases. The court highlighted the importance of adhering to established legal principles while also considering the evolving nature of societal needs. This decision serves as a precedent in similar cases, providing guidance on how courts should approach complex legal questions. |
| Summary |
In this landmark case from 1949, the court addressed significant legal issues surrounding the interpretation of statutory provisions. The case is noteworthy for its exploration of the balance between legislative intent and judicial interpretation. The ruling underscored the necessity for legal clarity and the potential consequences of ambiguous language in laws. This case is relevant for legal practitioners and scholars, as it sets important precedents for future interpretations of similar statutory frameworks. The court's decision is a vital reference point for discussions on legislative drafting and judicial review, emphasizing the role of the judiciary in maintaining the rule of law. |
| Court |
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Not available
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
Not available
|
| Respondents |
Not available
|
| Citations |
1949 SLD
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|