Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 266a4f4b-d527-467f-a438-3a776e980dd1
Body View case body.
Case Number Human Rights Case No. 681 of 1992
Decision Date Feb 01, 1994
Hearing Date Dec 21, 1993
Decision The petition filed by Haji Muhammad Akram, a former Canteen Supervisor at PIA, was dismissed as incompetent. The court found that the National Industrial Relations Commission had recommended the petitioner's reinstatement; however, the Authority refused to implement this recommendation. The grounds for refusal included the petitioner's age and the fact that he had already received all dues under the 'golden hand shake' policy approximately ten years prior. The court concluded that there was no significant case of human rights violation or urgency that warranted the petition's acceptance.
Summary In the Supreme Court of Pakistan's Human Rights Case No. 681 of 1992, the petitioner, Haji Muhammad Akram, contested his removal from service by PIA under Martial Law Order No. 52 in 1982. The case revolves around the interpretation of the Industrial Relations Ordinance and the constitutional provisions regarding human rights. The National Industrial Relations Commission had previously recommended Akram's reinstatement, but the PIA rejected this on the basis of Akram's age and prior compensation. The court ruled that Akram's case did not demonstrate a violation of human rights that warranted judicial intervention, thus dismissing the petition. This case is significant for understanding the jurisdiction of labor relations bodies and the application of human rights laws in employment disputes.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved National Industrial Relations Commission, PIA
Judges ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, FAZAL ILAHI KHAN, WALI MUHAMMAD KHAN
Lawyers M. Bilal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court
Petitioners Haji Muhammad Akram
Respondents P.IA.
Citations 1995 SLD 1012, 1995 PLC 1
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Sections 2(3), 184(3)