| Case ID |
26680bfa-eac7-48a1-857f-0966670b5f5b |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Appeal No. 5391 of 1997 |
| Decision Date |
Nov 21, 2000 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court held that the interest earned on money borrowed for the purchase of plant and machinery, which was kept in short-term deposits and used for bill discounting, is taxable as income from other sources. This reversed the Kerala High Court's decision, which had ruled that the interest should not be taxable. The court concluded that the interest income is assessable to tax in the hands of the assessee, affirming the principles established in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. v. CIT. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Autokast Ltd, the Supreme Court of India addressed the taxation of interest earned from short-term deposits made with borrowed funds. The case originated from a decision by the Kerala High Court, which ruled that the interest earned was not taxable and could instead reduce the cost of the plant and machinery. However, the Supreme Court overturned this ruling, asserting that such interest income should be classified as taxable income from other sources as per Section 56 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision is significant as it clarifies the tax obligations of companies regarding interest income derived from funds borrowed for business operations. It aligns with previous judgments, including Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. v. CIT, reinforcing the importance of proper tax assessment in corporate financial activities. This ruling has implications for businesses in India, especially those involved in significant capital investments, as it delineates the boundaries of taxable income and reinforces compliance with tax legislation. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of India
|
| Entities Involved |
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Autokast Ltd
|
| Judges |
S. P. Bharucha,
Doraiswamy Raju,
Ms. Ruma Pal
|
| Lawyers |
M. L. Verma,
S.W. A. Quadri,
S.K. Dwivedi,
Ms. Sushma Suri,
Dr. S. Narayanan,
Subramonium Prasad
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Autokast Ltd
|
| Citations |
2001 SLD 363,
2001 PTD 2468,
(2001) 248 ITR 110
|
| Other Citations |
Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. v. CIT (1997) 227 ITR 172,
CIT v. Autokast Ltd. 1999 PTD 3215
|
| Laws Involved |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
56
|