| Case ID |
25f7ebb4-5936-487e-9ab9-7bc4ddd37733 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
CIVIL APPEAL No. 324 OF 1965 |
| Decision Date |
Sep 20, 1966 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court ruled that the payment of 20% of net profits by the assessee to the Government was not capital expenditure but revenue expenditure. The court emphasized the need to distinguish between capital and revenue expenditures based on the nature of the transaction and the surrounding circumstances. The judgment of the Kerala High Court was set aside, and the case was remanded for further consideration of other issues raised in the reference. |
| Summary |
The Supreme Court case of Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd v. Commissioner of INCOME TAX revolves around the classification of payments made by the company to the Government as either capital or revenue expenditure under the Income-tax Act. The court examined the nature of the agreement between the company and the Government, which included a provision for the Government to receive 20% of the net profits as part of the agreement for the sale of assets from a company being wound up. The court found that the payments were related to annual profits generated from business operations and not tied to the capital value of the assets acquired, thus classifying them as revenue expenditure. This decision highlights the complexities involved in tax law concerning the classification of expenditures and the implications for business operations. The ruling is significant for companies navigating similar tax issues, reinforcing the importance of understanding the nature of payments under tax regulations. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of India
|
| Entities Involved |
Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd,
Government of Travancore
|
| Judges |
J.C. Shah,
V. Ramaswami,
V. Bhargava
|
| Lawyers |
A.K. Sen,
G.L. Sanghi,
B.R. Agarwala,
S.T. Desai,
S.K. Iyer,
R.N. Sachthey
|
| Petitioners |
Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of INCOME TAX
|
| Citations |
1966 SLD 270 = (1966) 62 ITR 566
|
| Other Citations |
British Sugar Manufacturers Ltd. v. Harris [1939] 7 ITR 101 (CA),
Indian Radio and Cable Communications Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1937] 5 ITR 270 (PC),
Pondicherry Railway Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1931] 5 ITC 363,
Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1965] 57 ITR 521 (SC),
Raja Bejoy Singh Dudhuria v. CIT [1933] 1 ITR 135 (PC),
Jones v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1920] 1 KB 711,
Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. 36/49 Holdings Ltd. [1943] 25 Tax Cas 173,
CIT v. Kolhia Hirdagarh Co. Ltd. [1949] 17 ITR 545 (Bom.),
Minister of National Revenue v. Catherine Spooner [1933] AC 684,
CIT v. Travancore Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. [1964] 51 ITR 24 (Ker.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
37(1),
10(2)(xv)
|