Case ID |
2547e387-35f8-4f85-bcfb-aba852018b56 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Civil Revision No. 894 of 2010 |
Decision Date |
Oct 01, 2012 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The revision petition was dismissed as the concurrent findings of the two lower courts were upheld. The trial court had decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs based on substantial evidence showing they were the rightful owners of the suit-land, while the defendants were found to be tenants-at-will. The evidence from the plaintiffs was cogent and reliable, while the defendants failed to produce solid evidence to support their claims. The judgments from both the trial and appellate courts were deemed to be well-founded, with no miscarriage of justice or misreading of evidence occurring. Thus, the Peshawar High Court maintained the lower courts' decisions. |
Summary |
This case revolves around a dispute regarding ownership and possession of immovable property under the Specific Relief Act. The plaintiffs successfully proved their ownership of the suit-land, while the defendants, who were tenants, could not substantiate their claims. The Peshawar High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts, emphasizing the importance of cogent evidence in property disputes. This case highlights key principles of property law and the judicial process in resolving ownership conflicts. The court's decision reaffirmed the plaintiffs' rights, demonstrating the court's commitment to justice in property matters. Keywords such as 'property ownership', 'tenancy rights', 'legal proceedings', and 'evidence in court' are essential for understanding this case. |
Court |
Peshawar High Court
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
SHAH JEHAN KHAN AKHUNDZADA, J
|
Lawyers |
Jan Muhammad,
Saleem Anwar
|
Petitioners |
others,
MUHAMMAD AYUB SANI
|
Respondents |
others,
Mir JAFAR
|
Citations |
2013 SLD 2394,
2013 YLR 497
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
|
Sections |
42,
54,
8
|