Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 2547e387-35f8-4f85-bcfb-aba852018b56
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Revision No. 894 of 2010
Decision Date Oct 01, 2012
Hearing Date
Decision The revision petition was dismissed as the concurrent findings of the two lower courts were upheld. The trial court had decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs based on substantial evidence showing they were the rightful owners of the suit-land, while the defendants were found to be tenants-at-will. The evidence from the plaintiffs was cogent and reliable, while the defendants failed to produce solid evidence to support their claims. The judgments from both the trial and appellate courts were deemed to be well-founded, with no miscarriage of justice or misreading of evidence occurring. Thus, the Peshawar High Court maintained the lower courts' decisions.
Summary This case revolves around a dispute regarding ownership and possession of immovable property under the Specific Relief Act. The plaintiffs successfully proved their ownership of the suit-land, while the defendants, who were tenants, could not substantiate their claims. The Peshawar High Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts, emphasizing the importance of cogent evidence in property disputes. This case highlights key principles of property law and the judicial process in resolving ownership conflicts. The court's decision reaffirmed the plaintiffs' rights, demonstrating the court's commitment to justice in property matters. Keywords such as 'property ownership', 'tenancy rights', 'legal proceedings', and 'evidence in court' are essential for understanding this case.
Court Peshawar High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges SHAH JEHAN KHAN AKHUNDZADA, J
Lawyers Jan Muhammad, Saleem Anwar
Petitioners others, MUHAMMAD AYUB SANI
Respondents others, Mir JAFAR
Citations 2013 SLD 2394, 2013 YLR 497
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
Sections 42, 54, 8