| Case ID |
22fa616f-a981-4a5b-8a22-a6594ceebc51 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
I.C.A. No. 209 of 2020 |
| Decision Date |
Oct 01, 2020 |
| Hearing Date |
Sep 23, 2020 |
| Decision |
The Islamabad High Court granted the instant intra Court appeal filed by Nestle Pakistan Limited, allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned judgment dated 11.08.2020. This decision nullifies the Registrar Trade Unions' order dated 20.07.2020, which had dismissed Nestle's application under Section 11 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012, seeking the cancellation of the registration of respondent No.2 as a trade union. The court remanded the matter to the Registrar Trade Unions (R.T.U.) with the directive to determine whether respondent No.2 currently meets the requirement of having at least one-fifth of the total workmen employed in Nestle's establishment as members, as mandated by Section 8(2)(b) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. The R.T.U. is expected to reach a decision within two weeks from receiving this order, ensuring that both the appellant and respondent No.2 are given an opportunity to present their case in a hearing. This judgment emphasizes the ongoing obligations of trade unions to maintain the required membership proportions and reinforces the authority of the R.T.U. to oversee and enforce compliance with the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Nestle Pakistan Limited versus The Registrar Trade Unions and Others (I.C.A. No. 209 of 2020), adjudicated by the Islamabad High Court on October 1, 2020, the court addressed critical issues regarding the registration and cancellation of trade unions under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. Nestle Pakistan Limited sought the cancellation of the registration of respondent No.2, Mohib Employees Union, arguing that the union did not meet the membership requirements stipulated by Section 8(2)(b) of the Act, which mandates that a trade union must represent at least one-fifth of the total number of workmen employed in an establishment when multiple unions are present. The appellant asserted that with more than five registered trade unions in their establishment, respondent No.2's membership could not possibly fulfill the one-fifth requirement, thereby rendering its registration invalid.
The court meticulously examined the procedural aspects and the substantive requirements under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012. It was highlighted that even if a trade union initially satisfies the registration criteria, subsequent non-compliance, such as a decline in membership below the required threshold, mandates the Registrar Trade Unions to initiate cancellation proceedings under Section 11. The appellant's application was initially dismissed by the Registrar Trade Unions based on an inquiry report which noted that the matter was under judicial consideration in the Supreme Court—a stance the Islamabad High Court found insufficient grounds for dismissing the application.
A pivotal factor in this case was the interpretation of the law regarding the responsibilities of the Registrar Trade Unions and the rights of employers and rival unions to report non-compliance. The court underscored that the obligations under Section 8(2)(b) are ongoing and not limited to the registration phase. Therefore, if a union's membership falls below one-fifth at any point, the Registrar Trade Unions must proceed with cancellation, regardless of other registrations in the establishment.
The judgment also touched upon constitutional provisions, referencing Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, which delineates the jurisdiction of the High Courts, clarifying that factual inquiries into membership ratios fall within the administrative purview of the Registrar Trade Unions, not the court. This separation of duties ensures that administrative bodies maintain control over tariffs and union registrations, preventing undue judicial intervention in technical compliance matters.
Furthermore, the court addressed procedural lapses in the appellant's filings, such as the lack of necessary documentation like the Board's resolution or the Articles and Memorandum of Association in earlier writ petitions. However, it ruled that the mere dismissal of such petitions does not conclusively affirm the union's compliance or registration validity—merely that the petitions were procedurally deficient.
Ultimately, the Islamabad High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the earlier judgment, and remanded the case back to the Registrar Trade Unions with explicit instructions to reassess respondent No.2's membership in line with legal requirements. The R.T.U. was given a two-week timeframe to conduct a thorough evaluation and provide a hearing, ensuring both parties could present their arguments effectively. This decision not only highlights the importance of maintaining union integrity and compliance with membership criteria but also reinforces the accountability of administrative bodies in regulating labor relations.
Key takeaways from this case include the affirmation that employers retain the right to challenge union registrations based on membership criteria, the continuous obligation of unions to adhere to statutory requirements, and the delineation of responsibilities between judicial bodies and administrative authorities. This judgment serves as a critical reference for labor law practitioners, employers, and trade unions, emphasizing the necessity of transparent and accurate membership records and the proactive role of employers in safeguarding their interests through legal channels.
In an era where labor relations are increasingly complex, this case underlines the strategic importance of understanding and navigating the statutory frameworks that govern union operations. The Islamabad High Court's decision provides clarity on the enforcement mechanisms available to employers and sets a precedent for similar cases, promoting fair and effective labor practices. Entities involved in union activities must remain vigilant in their compliance efforts, ensuring that they not only meet initial registration requirements but also maintain them over the tenure of union operations. The ruling also encourages a balanced approach to labor disputes, advocating for procedural fairness and adherence to legal standards, ultimately contributing to a more stable and equitable industrial environment. |
| Court |
Islamabad High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Nestle Pakistan Limited,
The Registrar Trade Unions and Others,
Mohib Employees Union,
Pak Food Employees Union,
Deputy Registrar, N.I.R.C., Multan Bench
|
| Judges |
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB,
LUBNA SALEEM PERVEZ
|
| Lawyers |
Farooq Amjad Meer,
Raheel Aslam,
Muhammad Mazher Javed
|
| Petitioners |
NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED
|
| Respondents |
THE REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS AND OTHERS
|
| Citations |
2021 SLD 1026,
2021 PLC 59
|
| Other Citations |
Intra Court Appeal No.391 of 2019 rel.,
Writ Petition No.2089/2020,
Writ Petition No.1400/2017,
Civil Petition No.3978/2019,
Division Bench judgment dated 09.04.2020 passed in intra Court Appeal No.391/2019
|
| Laws Involved |
Industrial Relations Act, 2012,
Constitution of Pakistan
|
| Sections |
11(2),
8(2)(b),
3(a),
5,
54(b),
199
|