| Case ID |
22dbb15c-9d23-4e14-96cd-ec7fafb27553 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
MISC. JUDICIAL CASE Nos. 172 AND 173 OF 1961 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 20, 1965 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Supreme Court ruled that the provisions of the second proviso to section 34(3) of the Income-tax Act, which authorized the assessment or reassessment of any person other than the assessee beyond the specified limitation period, were invalid as they violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The assessments made against the wife, Shrimati Rama Jain, were annulled because she had voluntarily filed her income tax returns, and thus her income could not be described as having escaped assessment. The assessments for the years 1946-47 and 1947-48 were also barred by limitation. Consequently, the decision was made in favor of the assessee, affirming the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order to assess the wife separately. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt. Rama Jain, the Patna High Court addressed crucial issues regarding income tax assessments and limitations under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case revolved around the assessment years 1946-47 and 1947-48, where the income of the assessee, Shrimati Rama Jain, was included in her husband’s return without separate taxation. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner directed that the wife’s income be assessed separately after it was determined that she had filed her returns voluntarily. The case brought forth significant legal questions regarding the validity of the assessments made under section 34 of the Income-tax Act. The Supreme Court's ruling highlighted the importance of adhering to constitutional principles, specifically the right to equality under Article 14. The decision emphasized the necessity of lawful procedures in tax assessments, reinforcing that income tax assessments must respect individual rights and limitations set forth in tax legislation. This case remains a pivotal reference point in discussions surrounding tax law and individual rights in India. |
| Court |
Patna High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
R.K. Choudhary,
A.B.N. Sinha
|
| Lawyers |
S.N. Datta,
Mrs. Leila Seth,
Tarkeshwar Prasad,
Purnendu Narayan
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Smt. Rama Jain
|
| Citations |
1966 SLD 207,
(1966) 60 ITR 655
|
| Other Citations |
S.C. Prashar v. Vasantsen Dwarkadas [1963] 49 ITR 1 (SC)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
153,
34(3)
|