| Case ID |
2257a6d7-b174-4307-a1a5-35ab60dd6fbb |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Bail Application No. S-28 of 2009 |
| Decision Date |
Mar 27, 2009 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The bail application of Safdar Ali and Sabir Ali was dismissed due to the presence of sufficient incriminating evidence against them. The court noted that both accused were named in the FIR and had specific roles in causing firearm injuries to the deceased, Imdad Ali. Medical evidence corroborated the eyewitness accounts, and weapons used in the crime were recovered from the accused. The applicants failed to establish their case for bail, leading to the dismissal of their application. |
| Summary |
The case revolves around a criminal bail application where the applicants, Safdar Ali and Sabir Ali, sought post-arrest bail in a murder case. The prosecution presented substantial evidence indicating the involvement of the applicants in the crime, including eyewitness testimonies and the recovery of weapons. The court found the evidence sufficient to conclude that granting bail would not be appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the application. This case highlights the importance of strong evidence in bail proceedings and the court's role in ensuring justice while balancing the rights of the accused. Keywords such as 'criminal law', 'bail application', 'murder case', and 'evidence in court' are crucial for understanding the legal implications and for SEO optimization. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
KHADIM HUSSAIN M. SHAIKH, JUSTICE
|
| Lawyers |
Habibullah G. Ghauri
|
| Petitioners |
SAFDAR ALI,
SABIR ALI
|
| Respondents |
THE State
|
| Citations |
2010 SLD 2779 = 2010 PCRLJ 301
|
| Other Citations |
Sooban v. The State 2003 YLR 2029,
Shahnawaz and others v. The State 2008 SCMR 1436
|
| Laws Involved |
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
|
| Sections |
497,
302,
337-H(ii),
114,
34
|