Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 216a36f8-79b2-4c3f-a8a4-b1733160de37
Body View case body.
Case Number Appeal No. 58 of 1987
Decision Date May 26, 1988
Hearing Date May 26, 1988
Decision The tribunal found that the inquiry against the appellant was conducted in his absence, violating mandatory procedural requirements. The appellant was not given the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, leading to the conclusion that the inquiry was flawed. Consequently, the punishment imposed was deemed unsustainable, and the case was remanded back to the Authorised Officer with instructions to allow the appellant to cross-examine witnesses and proceed according to the established rules.
Summary In this case, the Service Tribunal of Sindh addressed the appeal of DIN MUHAMMAD against a compulsory retirement order issued by the Deputy Director Health Services. The appellant faced multiple charges, of which he was found guilty on two counts involving misconduct and forgery. The tribunal underscored the importance of due process, noting that the inquiry was conducted without the appellant's presence, thereby infringing on his rights. The decision emphasizes the necessity for compliance with procedural norms in disciplinary proceedings, ensuring fairness and justice. This case highlights the critical role of legal representation and the right to cross-examine witnesses in maintaining the integrity of the inquiry process. Keywords: compulsory retirement, disciplinary proceedings, legal representation, due process, inquiry, Sind Service Tribunal.
Court Service Tribunal, Sindh
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MUNAWAR ALI KHAN (CHAIRMAN), DR. A. Q. QAZI (MEMBER-I), DARGAHI L. MANGI (MEMBER-II)
Lawyers Raiz Hussain Balouch, Abdul Saeed Khan Ghori
Petitioners DIN MUHAMMAD
Respondents 2 others, REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES, KARACHI DIVISION, KARACHI
Citations 1988 SLD 1303, 1988 PLC 733
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Sind Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973
Sections 4, 6(2)