| Case ID |
20e878ab-9363-4649-94dc-9fca454f8188 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 270 OF 1963 |
| Decision Date |
Nov 18, 1965 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court ruled that the wealth of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) should be assessed based on the net wealth at the last moment of the valuation date, rather than the first moment. The case centered around a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs that was partitioned among the coparceners of the HUF on the last day of the previous year. The court concluded that the wealth-tax authorities had incorrectly included this amount in the net wealth assessment since it had been distributed before the end of the valuation date. The ruling emphasized that any changes in ownership of assets on the valuation date must be accounted for, and that the principle of interpreting tax statutes in favor of the taxpayer applies in this situation. |
| Summary |
In the case of Dwarka Nath v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, the Allahabad High Court addressed a critical issue regarding the assessment of wealth for a Hindu Undivided Family under the Wealth-tax Act of 1957. The case focused on the valuation date of November 8, 1958, when a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs was partitioned among various coparceners of the HUF. The court held that the net wealth must be assessed at the last moment of the valuation date, rejecting the argument that the wealth should be considered based on its first moment. This ruling reinforced the understanding of how wealth is defined and assessed in the context of Hindu law, particularly in cases involving partial partitions. The court's decision highlighted the importance of timing in asset ownership and the necessity of adhering to the principles of tax law that favor taxpayers, ensuring clarity in the assessment process. This judgement is significant for legal practitioners and taxpayers alike, as it clarifies the interpretation of wealth in relation to the timing of asset distribution within a Hindu family structure. |
| Court |
Allahabad High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
M.C. Desai, C.J.,
S.C. Manchanda, J
|
| Lawyers |
R.L. Gulati,
R.K. Gulati,
S.C. Das
|
| Petitioners |
Dwarka Nath
|
| Respondents |
Commissioner of Wealth Tax
|
| Citations |
1966 SLD 307 = (1966) 62 ITR 304
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Purushottam Dass Rais [1966] 61 ITR 86 (All.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Wealth-tax Act, 1957
|
| Sections |
2(m),
20
|