| Case ID |
20d400f5-6b46-4fd2-9b75-1a1686ae8939 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
|
| Decision Date |
Oct 24, 1972 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The appeal primarily addressed the inclusion of a gift of Rs. 55,000 in the property passing upon death and the valuation of a Consul 4 car. The deceased had made a gift to her husband, which was deemed property passing, as it did not meet the conditions for exclusion under the Estate Duty Act. The Tribunal found that gifts are always considered property passing unless they fulfill three cumulative conditions: they must be bona fide, made more than five years before death, and subject to gift tax payment. In this case, the gift did not meet the bona fide condition, thus qualifying it as property passing. The valuation of the car was also contested, with the Tribunal siding with the appellant's claim of a reasonable valuation. The case was remitted back to the Deputy Controller for further examination of the loan and its implications on the property passing assessment. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the interpretation of the Estate Duty Act, 1950, specifically concerning the treatment of gifts made by the deceased and their classification as property passing upon death. The key issue was whether the gift of Rs. 55,000 to the deceased's husband could be excluded from the estate's valuation. The Appellate Tribunal emphasized that all gifts are presumed to be property passing unless specific criteria are met, which include the gift being bona fide, made more than five years prior to death, and the associated gift tax being paid. The Tribunal concluded that the failure to meet even one of these conditions results in the gift being included in the estate valuation. Additionally, the case examined the valuation of a Consul 4 car, ultimately siding with the appellant's argument for a lower valuation. This decision is pivotal for understanding the nuances of estate duty and the implications of gift tax regulations in estate management. |
| Court |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
M.T. SIDDIQUI, PRESIDENT,
A.A. ZUBERI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
|
| Lawyers |
Mino N. Bhanjee, F.C.A.,
S.M. Sibtain, D.R.
|
| Petitioners |
Not available
|
| Respondents |
Not available
|
| Citations |
1979 SLD 709,
(1979) 40 TAX 3
|
| Other Citations |
Gulberg Textile Mills v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karachi (1978) 37 Taxation 125 H.C. Kar.
|
| Laws Involved |
Estate Duty Act, 1950
|
| Sections |
10,
11
|