| Case ID |
20bfa011-25be-41c8-8095-2f547abe03a5 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
D.B. Income-tax Reference Application No.25 of 199 |
| Decision Date |
Jul 17, 1996 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Rajasthan High Court affirmed the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which had deleted the disallowance of Rs.37,820 made under Rule 6-B(3) of the Income-tax Rules for the presentation of watches to dealers. The Tribunal found that the expenditure was not for advertisement but for maintaining good relations with existing dealers. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of Rs.6,451 related to car maintenance, stating that the finding was purely a question of fact. The Revenue's application to refer questions of law was dismissed on the grounds that no referable questions of law arose and that the tax effect was below Rs.30,000, aligning with a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Consequently, the application under section 256(2) was also dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's stance. |
| Summary |
In a notable case concerning income tax deductions, the Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of certain business expenditure claims made by Ayurved Sewa Ashram Ltd. The case revolved around the deductibility of Rs.37,820 spent on watches presented to dealers at a sales conference, which the Income-tax Officer initially disallowed. The Tribunal intervened, asserting that the expenditure was not for advertisement purposes but rather for fostering good relations with dealers. Furthermore, the Tribunal addressed another disallowance of Rs.6,451 related to car maintenance, which was also deleted. The court underscored that the determination of whether a gift item carries advertising value is a factual finding. The Revenue's attempts to refer questions of law were dismissed, emphasizing that no significant questions arose from the case. This case underscores the importance of maintaining good business relationships and highlights the nuances involved in income tax deductions. The decision is pivotal for similar future cases, illustrating the thresholds that govern the admissibility of claims under the Indian Income Tax Act. |
| Court |
Rajasthan High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Ayurved Sewashram Ltd.
|
| Judges |
B. R. ARORA,
J. C. VERMA
|
| Lawyers |
Sandeep Bhandawat
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
|
| Respondents |
AYURVED SEWA ASHRAM LTD
|
| Citations |
1999 SLD 145,
1999 PTD 933,
(1997) 225 ITR 778
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961,
Indian Income Tax Rules, 1962
|
| Sections |
37(3-A),
256(2),
Rule 6-B(3)
|