Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 207a96a3-4316-4493-930a-4e41659368f9
Body View case body.
Case Number Civil Petitions Nos.317, 321 and 347-L of 1999
Decision Date Jul 01, 2002
Hearing Date
Decision The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of communication regarding adjournments between the advocates to ensure fairness and proper scheduling. It directed that every Advocate-on-Record and Advocate Supreme Court applying for an adjournment must inform the opposing counsel in a timely manner. This ruling aims to improve the procedural conduct in the Supreme Court, ensuring that both parties can manage their schedules effectively. The court acknowledged a grievance from the Respondent's counsel regarding a lack of notification about the adjournment request, underscoring the need for adherence to this new procedural requirement.
Summary In the case of Civil Petitions Nos.317, 321 and 347-L of 1999, the Supreme Court of Pakistan addressed the procedural issue of seeking adjournments in court cases. The court ruled on the necessity for advocates to provide timely notice to opposing counsel when requesting adjournments. This decision was made in light of a complaint from the Respondent's counsel, who was not informed of the adjournment request made by the Petitioner's counsel. The ruling aims to enhance the efficiency and fairness of court proceedings by ensuring that all parties are adequately informed and can manage their legal schedules. The court's decision underscores the importance of communication and procedural compliance in legal practice, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE GYMKHANA
Judges RANA BHAGWANDAS, TANVIR AHMED KHAN
Lawyers Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, A. Karim Malik
Petitioners , LAHORE GYMKHANA
Respondents , GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Citations 2003 SLD 740, 2003 SCMR 1856
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Supreme Court Rules, 1980
Sections O. XIX, R. 2