| Case ID |
20431d48-d50e-4e1a-bf74-bd9c777fc288 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 326 OF 1974 |
| Decision Date |
|
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The court held that the amount of Rs. 23,27,500 shown as a 'Reserve for taxation' in the balance sheet of the company was indeed a reserve within the meaning of rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The court affirmed that this reserve was eligible for inclusion in the capital computation for surtax purposes. The decision was based on the fact that the assessee company maintained its accounts on a completed contract basis and that the reserve had been clearly designated in the balance sheet, thus not being categorized as a provision. The ruling reinforced the interpretation of reserves versus provisions in tax law, setting a precedent for similar cases in the future. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the assessment of the income tax reserve created by Braithwaite, Burn & Jessop Construction Co. Ltd. The fundamental issue was whether the reserve for taxation could be considered as a reserve in the context of capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal which had earlier ruled that the amount was not a provision as it had no relation with any accrued liability. The case emphasized the importance of correctly categorizing financial reserves and provisions, which is crucial for tax calculations. The ruling provides clarity on how reserves should be treated in accounting practices, especially in contract-based businesses. This case is significant for tax practitioners and corporate accountants as it sets a clear guideline on the treatment of reserves and provisions in financial statements. |
| Court |
Calcutta High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
M/s. Braithwaite, Burn and Jessop Constructions Co. Ltd.
|
| Judges |
Suhas Chandra Sen J.,
Sabyasachi Mukharji J.
|
| Lawyers |
Ajit Sengupta,
Sunil Mukherjee,
Ranendra Nath Dutt
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Braithwaite, Burn & Jessop Construction Co. Ltd.
|
| Citations |
1982 SLD 1342,
(1982) 138 ITR 768
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Braithwaite, Burn & Jessop Construction Co. Ltd. [1978] 113 ITR 577 (Cal.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964
|
| Sections |
Rule 1
|