| Case ID |
1fd92c30-6b28-4710-9f6d-167603e1462c |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Appeals Nos.207 of 1990 and 7-P of 1991 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 14, 1992 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
In these two Criminal Appeals arising from the Peshawar High Court, the Supreme Court examined the provisions of section 171 of the Customs Act, 1969, focusing on whether non-compliance with its requirements was fatal to the prosecution. The Court found that the failure to serve a notice under section 171 was not fatal if the accused were sufficiently informed through other means, such as a recovery memo. The Court overturned the High Court's ruling that had acquitted the respondents on the basis of mandatory compliance with section 171. The decision emphasized that the accused must be informed of the allegations against them, and as long as the prosecution can demonstrate substantial compliance, the case may proceed. The Court clarified that the burden of proof lay with the accused to show ignorance of the smuggling activity. Ultimately, the Court resolved the conflict in interpretation between different High Courts regarding the enforcement of section 171, establishing that non-service of notice does not inherently invalidate prosecutions under the Customs Act. |
| Summary |
This case centers on the interpretation of section 171 of the Customs Act, 1969, which requires authorities to inform accused individuals of the grounds for their seizure or arrest. The Supreme Court of Pakistan reviewed conflicting judgments from lower courts, particularly regarding the necessity of serving notice under section 171. In these appeals, the Court determined that while notice is important, its absence does not automatically nullify the prosecution if the accused were otherwise informed of the allegations. The case involved the seizure of contraband goods and the subsequent legal challenges faced by the accused, who claimed they were unaware of the smuggling activity. The Court's ruling reinforced the principle that the defendants carry the burden of proof to demonstrate lack of knowledge regarding the illicit goods. This decision is significant in clarifying procedural requirements in customs law, particularly the handling of notices and the rights of the accused during legal proceedings. Key takeaways from this ruling include the emphasis on substantial compliance with legal procedures over strict adherence, underscoring the importance of ensuring that defendants are adequately informed of the charges against them. |
| Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, CHIEF JUSTICE,
MUHAMMAD AFZAL LONE, JUSTICE,
WALI MUHAMMAD KHAN, JUSTICE
|
| Lawyers |
Nur Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants (in both the Appeals),
Shakirullah Jan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents (in Criminal Appeal No. 7-P of 1991)
|
| Petitioners |
STATE THROUGH DEPUTY Attorney General, PESHAWAR
|
| Respondents |
BANDA GUL and 2 others,
IMDAD KHAN and others
|
| Citations |
1993 SLD 278,
1993 SCMR 311,
1994 PTCL 322
|
| Other Citations |
Abdul Rauf Khan v. Collector, Central Excise and Land Custom; Peshawar and 3 others 1980 SCMR 114,
Azizullah v. The State PLD 1981 Kar. 250,
S. M. Yousuf and others v. Collector of Customs and others PLD 1968 Kar. 599,
Hizbullah v. The State and another PLD 1994 Quetta 1
|
| Laws Involved |
Customs Act, 1969,
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
|
| Sections |
156(90),
171,
187,
185(3)
|