Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1f5aea95-3da7-46b4-adb2-b5cd73602b83
Body View case body.
Case Number Criminal Petition No. 249-L of 2009
Decision Date Jun 29, 2011
Hearing Date Jun 29, 2011
Decision The Supreme Court of Pakistan dismissed the petition filed by Nazeer Ahmad against the acquittal of the respondents, Gehne Khan and others, by the High Court. The High Court had annulled the trial court's conviction based on the unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, the distance of eyewitnesses from the crime scene, the lack of physical evidence (the torch), and the delay in conducting the postmortem, which all adversely affected the credibility of the prosecution's case. The Court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments and upheld the High Court's decision, refusing leave to appeal.
Summary In this significant case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan dealt with the issues surrounding the acquittal of the accused in a murder case. The court emphasized the importance of timely lodging of FIRs and the reliability of eyewitness accounts, particularly in criminal proceedings. The decision highlighted the inherent challenges in prosecuting cases with delays and lack of evidence, reinforcing the principle of benefit of the doubt in favor of the accused. The judgment serves as a critical reference for future cases related to criminal law, emphasizing the necessity of a robust prosecution and the standards of evidence required for a conviction. Keywords: Supreme Court, acquittal, murder case, FIR, eyewitness, criminal law, prosecution, benefit of the doubt.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved Not available
Judges TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, MIAN SAQIB NISAR, ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA
Lawyers Mrs. Fakhar-un-Nisa, Advocate Supreme Court, Faiz-ur-Rehnman, Advocate-on-Record, Mazhar Sher Awan, Additional P.G.
Petitioners NAZEER AHMAD
Respondents others, GEHNE KHAN
Citations 2011 SLD 2253, 2011 SCMR 1473
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Constitution of Pakistan
Sections 302, Art. 185(3)