Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1f4e9fdc-1fc0-4388-9ca9-d2b87f32452c
Body View case body.
Case Number C.R. No. 334-A of 2010
Decision Date Dec 11, 2017
Hearing Date
Decision The Peshawar High Court set aside the judgments and decrees passed by the lower courts, declaring the sale through the impugned mutation illegal. The court held that a co-sharer cannot alienate property beyond their share, and the vendor's actions constituted collusion with revenue officials. The petitioners' claims were upheld, and the impugned mutation was annulled, reaffirming the principle that ownership cannot exceed what is legally held.
Summary In the case of MST. IRUM UN NISA AND 8 OTHERS VS MST. NAZ PARVER AND ANOTHER, the Peshawar High Court addressed issues surrounding the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act and the Transfer of Property Act. The court examined whether a co-sharer could sell land beyond their entitled share. The ruling clarified that the revenue record's entries do not confer actual title and that any sale exceeding ownership rights is invalid. The judgment emphasized the legal principle that no person can transfer better title than they own, setting a precedent for future property disputes. This case highlights the importance of adhering to statutory limits in land transactions, ensuring equitable distribution among co-sharers. Keywords: property law, co-sharer rights, land revenue act, transfer of property act, legal ownership.
Court Peshawar High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges SYED ARSHAD ALI
Lawyers Muhammad Ayub Khan, Sultan Ahmed Jamshed
Petitioners MST. IRUM UN NISA, 8 OTHERS
Respondents ANOTHER, MST. NAZ PARVER
Citations 2019 SLD 427, 2019 CLC 335
Other Citations PLD 1959 SC 09, 1986 SCMR 356, 1994 SCMR 2087, 1998 SCMR 1589, 2005 SCMR 911, 1984 SCMR 94
Laws Involved Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Land Revenue Act, (XVII of 1967), Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Sections 42, 54