| Case ID |
1f3006c6-d972-42fd-8218-c0410896024d |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT APPEAL No. 91 OF 2003 |
| Decision Date |
Mar 24, 2006 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Tribunal found that the transaction in question was genuine, and thus upheld the assessee's claim for interest deductions under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The High Court could not interfere with the factual findings of the Tribunal unless an error of law was identified, which was not the case here. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the assessee was entitled to the benefits of the interest on the borrowed capital used for the business transaction. The ruling reinforced the principle that every transaction must be examined on its own merits to determine its genuineness. |
| Summary |
The case revolves around the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically Section 260A and Section 36(1)(iii), concerning an appeal regarding interest deductions claimed by Gom Industries Ltd. The Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, which had found the transaction genuine, allowing the assessee to claim interest deductions despite the revenue's objections. The ruling highlighted the importance of examining transactions on their own merits, emphasizing that once a transaction is deemed genuine, the benefits must be granted to the assessee. This case is significant for tax law practitioners and entities involved in similar transactions, as it sets precedent on how genuine business transactions should be treated for tax purposes, reinforcing the notion that the court respects factual findings by lower tribunals unless a clear legal error is demonstrated. |
| Court |
Madhya Pradesh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Gom Industries Ltd.,
M.M. Industries
|
| Judges |
A.M. Sapre,
Ashok Kumar Tiwari
|
| Lawyers |
R.L. Jain,
Ku. V. Mandlik,
R.K. Sarda
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Gom Industries Ltd.
|
| Citations |
2008 SLD 3830,
(2008) 299 ITR 42
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. [2002] 258 ITR 365/ 124 Taxman 707 (Delhi)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
260A,
36(1)(iii)
|