Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1e9968c5-90cf-435c-8d21-360d3f9ba051
Body View case body.
Case Number Criminal M. No. 974-A/2020 in Criminal M. (B.A.) N
Decision Date Oct 22, 2020
Hearing Date
Decision The court considered the application of Mst. Safeena Shah for permission to deposit the surety amount in cash. It was determined that Section 513 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not authorize the court to demand cash security unless requested by the accused. The court acknowledged that the applicant was a permanent resident of District R and had insufficient links to District H, making her request genuine. Therefore, the court permitted her to deposit the surety amount of Rs.200,000 in cash, ensuring her release on bail upon providing a personal bond and a bank guarantee.
Summary In this notable case, Mst. Safeena Shah sought permission from the Peshawar High Court to deposit her bail surety in cash due to her inability to arrange local sureties in District H, where she was not a resident. The court examined the implications of Section 513 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which allows for cash deposits of security under specific circumstances. The ruling underscored the importance of the accused's request in determining the court's decision on cash security. The judgment reflects the balance between legal provisions and the practical realities faced by individuals in the judicial system. This case highlights the role of courts in ensuring fair access to justice, especially in situations where individuals may face challenges in meeting traditional surety requirements. Keywords: bail, surety, Criminal Procedure Code, cash deposit, justice.
Court Peshawar High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges SHAKEEL AHMAD, JUSTICE
Lawyers Amir Sattar Tanoli for Petitioner, Sardar Muhammad Asif, A.A.G. for the State
Petitioners MST. SAFEENA SHAH
Respondents THE STATE AND OTHERS
Citations 2021 SLD 1325, 2021 PCRLJ 668
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Sections 513