Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1b4ab1f7-fda7-477d-9545-b7b1a25bcd97
Body View case body.
Case Number C.R. No. 05 of 2021
Decision Date May 03, 2021
Hearing Date
Decision The Quetta High Court upheld the order of the Additional District Judge-III, Quetta, allowing the respondent/plaintiff to produce additional documents after remand from the Supreme Court. The court emphasized that procedural laws should be liberally construed to advance the cause of justice. The petitioner/defendant's objections regarding the late introduction of documents were dismissed, as the court found that the necessary conditions for allowing such documents were met, and the authenticity of the documents was not in doubt.
Summary In the case of C.R. No. 05 of 2021, the Quetta High Court addressed a significant legal issue regarding the production of documents under the Civil Procedure Code. The case revolved around a suit for recovery of Rs. 8,000,000 filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/defendant. Following a series of appeals and remands, the trial court allowed the introduction of additional evidence, highlighting the court's duty to uphold justice and fairness. The ruling reiterates the principle that procedural rules should not obstruct legitimate claims and that courts must facilitate the presentation of relevant evidence to ensure just outcomes. This case underscores the importance of a liberal interpretation of procedural laws, which can significantly impact the administration of justice. Keywords: Quetta High Court, Civil Procedure Code, justice, legal principles, evidence production.
Court Quetta High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges ABDUL HAMEED BALOCH, J.
Lawyers M/s. Abdul Jabbar and Farah Farooq, Mr. Jamil Ahmed Khan Babai
Petitioners ABDUL KAREEM
Respondents SULTAN BADSHAH
Citations 2022 SLD 1704, 2022 PLJ 48
Other Citations PLD 2004 Azad (JK) 43, 2013 CLC 1789, PLD 2020 Balochistan 5, 2005 SCMR 152
Laws Involved Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Sections 2