Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1adfbabc-8de7-40a1-9ad5-26269876fad7
Body View case body.
Case Number C.P. S-1111 of 2018
Decision Date Feb 17, 2020
Hearing Date Jan 22, 2020
Decision The Sindh High Court ruled that the Rent Controller had misapplied the law regarding the duty of the landlord to carry out necessary repairs as stipulated under Section 12 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. The Court found that the tenant's application for repairs should not have been denied based on the rent increase issue. The case was remanded for further inquiry, emphasizing that the landlord is obligated to ensure that the premises are fit for human habitation and that repairs should not be contingent upon rental payments or increases. The decision underscores the landlord's responsibility and the tenant's rights under the law, providing clarity on rental agreements and obligations in similar disputes.
Summary The case revolves around the interpretation of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, particularly Section 12, which addresses the landlord's duty to maintain rented premises. The petitioner, a tenant, sought repairs for a rented flat but faced denial from the Rent Controller, who cited issues related to rent increases. The Sindh High Court found this reasoning flawed, stating that the landlord must fulfill repair obligations regardless of rent disputes. The ruling highlights the significance of tenant rights and landlord responsibilities, ensuring that premises remain habitable and safe. This decision is pivotal for future cases involving rental disputes, as it clarifies the legal framework governing tenant-landlord relationships in Sindh.
Court Sindh High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MUHAMMAD SHAFI SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE, NAFEESA BEGUM
Lawyers Manzar Bashir
Petitioners MUHAMMAD SHAFI SIDDIQUI
Respondents 2 OTHERS, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN
Citations 2021 SLD 134 = 2021 CLC 98
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979
Sections 12