Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1abfcb05-077f-4974-8cba-9bb297465a4f
Body View case body.
Case Number
Decision Date May 21, 1991
Hearing Date
Decision The court held that since a regular assessment had been made, it was unnecessary to question the validity of the summary assessment order under Section 132(5) of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner was permitted to apply for the return of the seized articles in accordance with the regular assessment order. Additionally, the court stated that the petitioner could deposit an amount equal to the value of the seized goods towards the tax liability and seek their return. The petitioner was also allowed to apply to be included in the appeal against the assessment order, which would be dealt with according to the law. No costs were awarded in this decision.
Summary In this case, the Allahabad High Court deliberated on the implications of Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly focusing on the search and seizure procedures. The court concluded that once a regular assessment has been established, the need to validate or invalidate any summary assessment order becomes redundant. This ruling underscores the importance of regular assessments in the context of tax law and the rights of the assessee to seek the return of seized items. The decision is pivotal for advocates and tax professionals navigating complex tax litigation, as it clarifies the procedural rights of petitioners in relation to seized assets and assessment orders. This case serves as a significant reference for future cases involving search, seizure, and assessment in tax law.
Court Allahabad High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J., Dr. R.R. Misra, J.
Lawyers Rajesh Kumar, Sudhir Chandra
Petitioners Vijay Kumar
Respondents Commissioner of Income tax
Citations 1991 SLD 1274, (1991) 187 ITR 559
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Income-tax Act, 1961
Sections 132, 132(5)