Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 179fe901-28c9-4b54-bb30-ad6b284d3d56
Body View case body.
Case Number Constitutional Petition No. 1083 of 1975
Decision Date Aug 08, 1978
Hearing Date
Decision The case was remanded for a rehearing of the appeal by the competent authority. The court found that the petitioner was not given a proper opportunity to present his case, which violated principles of natural justice. The original order was set aside, and the case was directed to be referred to the appropriate authority for a fair hearing, ensuring that all parties, including the petitioner, were notified and given a chance to be heard. The status quo was to be maintained until further orders.
Summary In this pivotal constitutional petition, the Sindh High Court addressed critical issues surrounding property rights, rehabilitation, and due process under the law. The case involved Muhammad Rafique Khan challenging the Settlement Commissioner's order regarding non-evacuee properties. The court emphasized the importance of natural justice, stating that the petitioner had not been properly notified or given the opportunity to contest the order affecting his property rights. The judgment highlights the significance of adhering to established legal procedures and the necessity for competent authority in property disputes. The remand for rehearing underlines the court's commitment to ensuring fair access to justice for all parties involved in land disputes. This case serves as a reminder of the legal safeguards in place to protect property rights and the need for transparency and accountability in administrative decisions. Keywords: constitutional petition, property rights, natural justice, land disputes, due process, Sindh High Court, rehabilitation laws.
Court Sindh High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges Z.A. CHANNA, J
Lawyers Mr. Akhtar Mahmood, Mr. Imam Ali Kazi, Mr. S. M. Raza
Petitioners Muhammad Rafique Khan
Respondents The Settlement Commissioner (Land), Sukkur, Aid 2 Other
Citations 1980 SLD 1632, 1980 CLC 359
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Not available
Sections Not available