Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 1752f3a3-a09f-4b0f-8829-d05c77172fd4
Body View case body.
Case Number 345/1870 of 1982
Decision Date Oct 18, 1983
Hearing Date
Decision The Tribunal varied the punishment awarded to Muhammad Hassan, who had been dismissed from service for misconduct related to tampering with Canal Khatunis. The inquiry found that the allegations against him were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, particularly because he had not been allowed to cross-examine witnesses during the inquiry. The Tribunal concluded that the punishment was not in line with his level of guilt and varied it to a censure along with a stoppage of two increments for two years without future effect. The time spent out of service was treated as leave due.
Summary In the case of Muhammad Hassan vs. The Commissioner Multan Division, the Service Tribunal of Punjab addressed a dismissal based on alleged misconduct involving the manipulation of Canal Khatunis. This case emphasizes the importance of fair inquiry processes, including the right to cross-examine witnesses. The Tribunal found that the original inquiry did not substantiate the charges against Hassan and deemed the penalty of dismissal as excessively harsh. Instead, the Tribunal modified the punishment to censure and a two-year increment stoppage. This ruling highlights the critical balance between maintaining discipline in civil service and ensuring that due process is followed in disciplinary proceedings. Key terms include 'Punjab Civil Servants Rules', 'misconduct', 'due process', and 'disciplinary action'.
Court Service Tribunal, Punjab
Entities Involved Not available
Judges S. ABDUL, JABBAR KHAN, ABDUL HAMID CHAUDHRY
Lawyers Muhammad Iqbal Sargana, A.G. Humayun
Petitioners MUHAMMAD HASSAN
Respondents THE COMMISSIONER MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN, Assistant Commissioner/ Collector, Depalpur
Citations 1985 SLD 1626, 1985 PLC 170
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975
Sections R.6