| Case ID |
1747ba2b-95d0-4e8f-b998-cf8a132435b9 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
C.R. No. 731 of 2019 |
| Decision Date |
Jun 18, 2019 |
| Hearing Date |
Jun 18, 2019 |
| Decision |
The revision petition was dismissed as premature because the court found that there was no finally decided matter to be agitated. The court emphasized that the petitioners should wait for a final or interim order from the lower court before seeking revision. The order of the lower court, which dismissed the application for a temporary injunction, was suspended, but no further relief was granted. The court noted that any grievances could be filed as appropriate applications before the appellate court. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around a civil procedure matter concerning the granting of temporary injunctions under the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. The Lahore High Court dealt with a revision petition filed by petitioners who challenged an order from the Additional District Judge, Multan. The case highlights the importance of having a 'case decided' before seeking revisions, emphasizing that the court will not entertain petitions that do not meet this criterion. The ruling reiterates the procedural requirements for appealing interim orders and the necessity for petitioners to await final decisions before invoking the court's jurisdiction. It underscores the role of the judiciary in ensuring that only settled matters are brought forth for revision, maintaining judicial efficiency and clarity in civil proceedings. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
MUAZAMIL AKHTAR SHABIR, JUSTICE
|
| Lawyers |
Malik Muzaffar Qadir Tameem
|
| Petitioners |
SYED ALI MANZAR ZAIDI ETC.
|
| Respondents |
SYED NAFEES ETC.
|
| Citations |
2019 SLD 3202,
2019 PLJ 735
|
| Other Citations |
1994 SCMR 1991,
2006 SCMR 21,
PLD 2018 Lahore 91
|
| Laws Involved |
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
|
| Sections |
O.XXXIX,R.1,
O.XXXIX,R.2
|