| Case ID |
16de14a9-5c53-4bfd-960b-621292b40242 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Civil Revision No. 11 of 1993 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 07, 1993 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court dismissed the civil revision filed by SABZ ALI, maintaining the order that allowed IJAZ HUSSAN to be added as a party to the suit. The Court found that both claimants had valid claims based on agreements to sell and that to avoid conflicting decisions, it was necessary for them to contest their claims in one suit. The Court highlighted the relationship between the petitioner and the respondents, indicating a likelihood of collusion, thereby affirming the need for the newly-added respondent to be part of the proceedings. The decision emphasized the importance of including all necessary parties to ensure fair adjudication. |
| Summary |
In the case of Civil Revision No. 11 of 1993, the Lahore High Court dealt with the complexities of property claims resulting from competing agreements to sell. The petitioner, SABZ ALI, sought to dispute the claims of IJAZ HUSSAN, who had been added as a party to the suit due to allegations of collusion between the petitioner and other respondents. The court underscored the necessity of resolving such disputes in a single proceeding to prevent conflicting judgments. The judgment reaffirmed the principles of civil procedure regarding necessary parties and the need for transparency in property transactions, especially in familial contexts. This case serves as a critical reference for similar disputes in property law and civil procedure, particularly regarding the addition of parties in ongoing litigation. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
ABDUL MAJID TIWANA, J
|
| Lawyers |
|
| Petitioners |
SABZ ALI
|
| Respondents |
IJAZ HUSSAN,
Abbas Ali
|
| Citations |
1993 SLD 1088,
1993 CLC 2489
|
| Other Citations |
PLD 1975 SC 463,
PLD 1968 Lah. 1076
|
| Laws Involved |
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
|
| Sections |
O.1, R.10,
S. 115
|