Case ID |
16ab9aea-88fc-4823-b633-5ebd492ec7c6 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Civil petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 96 |
Decision Date |
Jul 12, 2001 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Supreme Court of Pakistan declined to interfere with the decision of the Service Tribunal, which had set aside the cancellation order of Nisar Ahmed's appointment. The case revolved around the legality of his appointment and subsequent cancellation by the Competent Authority. The Court found that the Service Tribunal had thoroughly examined the record and concluded that the cancellation was made for extraneous reasons. Hence, the petitioner's appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the appointment was valid and should not have been cancelled under the circumstances presented. |
Summary |
This case revolves around the cancellation of Nisar Ahmed's appointment as a civil servant and the subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court of Pakistan. The Supreme Court upheld the Service Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of lawful appointments and the role of competent authorities in public service. The ruling highlighted the necessity for good governance and the integrity of bureaucratic processes, stating that mere compliance with unlawful directives is not acceptable. The case serves as a precedent for future disputes regarding public service appointments, emphasizing adherence to legal frameworks and the protection of individual rights against arbitrary actions by authorities. |
Court |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
SH. RIAZ AHMED,
SYED DEEDAR HUSSAIN SHAH,
JAVED IQBAL
|
Lawyers |
Jehanzaib Rahim, Advocate Supreme Court,
M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record
|
Petitioners |
SHAMAS-ULBAHADUR
|
Respondents |
another,
NISAR AHMED
|
Citations |
2002 SLD 2447,
2002 PLD 68
|
Other Citations |
Zahid Akhtar v. Government of Punjab PLD 1995 SC 530
|
Laws Involved |
Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973),
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
|
Sections |
4,
212(3)
|