| Case ID |
168011c2-79f5-46b3-b285-d63a93d49437 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
I. T. A. No. 124(ASR)/2009 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 20, 2010 |
| Hearing Date |
Sep 23, 2009 |
| Decision |
The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that income from Duty Drawback (DBK), Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB), and Duty Free Remission Scheme (DFRC) must be classified as business income for the purpose of deductions under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court overturned the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which had previously upheld the assessee's view, citing a reversal by the Bombay High Court in a related case. The matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision according to the law. This ruling clarifies the treatment of certain incomes for exporters and emphasizes the need for accurate accounting in tax assessments. |
| Summary |
The case revolves around the interpretation of section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which pertains to deductions for exporters. The core issue was whether income from Duty Drawback (DBK), Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB), and Duty Free Remission Scheme (DFRC) should be considered as business income. The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, supporting the view that these incomes are indeed business income and must be accounted for in the tax deduction calculations under section 80HHC. This decision is significant for exporters as it clarifies the eligibility of various income types for tax deductions, impacting their financial reporting and tax strategy. The ruling also underscores the importance of following precedents set by higher courts, as the Tribunal's previous stance was overturned based on a prior ruling from the Bombay High Court. Overall, this decision reinforces the necessity for exporters to accurately report their income to comply with tax regulations, ensuring they can maximize their deductions appropriately. The keywords related to this case include 'Income-tax Act', 'exporter deductions', 'business income classification', and 'tax assessment clarity'. |
| Court |
Punjab and Haryana High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Adarsh Kumar Goel,
Ajay Kumar Mittal
|
| Lawyers |
Vivek Sethi,
Pankaj Jain
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
F. C. Sondhi & Co. (P.) Ltd.
|
| Citations |
2011 SLD 2594 = (2011) 334 ITR 141
|
| Other Citations |
CIT v. Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals [2010] 328 ITR 451 (Bom.),
Kalpataru Colours & Chemicals v. Addl. CIT [2009] 318 ITR (AT) 87 (Mum.)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
80HHC,
28(iiid),
28(iiie)
|