Case ID |
165d0355-cc8a-4e10-8298-c98ca93c717d |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
HYD-8 of 1994 |
Decision Date |
Dec 19, 1995 |
Hearing Date |
|
Decision |
The Labour Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the appellant, Mushtak Ali Kazi, who claimed that he should have been promoted from the position of Plumber to Junior Operator. The Tribunal found that the appellant could not substantiate his claim with any legal basis or settlement. It was determined that the matter of promotion to a specific post does not constitute an industrial dispute and therefore cannot be addressed in a grievance petition under Section 25-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The decision of the Labour Court was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. |
Summary |
In the case of Mushtak Ali Kazi vs. Hyderabad Development Authority, the appellant challenged his promotion as a Plumber instead of a Junior Operator. The Labour Appellate Tribunal ruled that the appellant lacked legal grounds for his claim, as he failed to provide any relevant law or settlement supporting his position. The ruling emphasized that promotion disputes do not fall under the category of industrial disputes as defined by the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. This case highlights the importance of legal frameworks in promotion disputes within labor relations, and it underscores the necessity for employees to understand their rights and the applicable regulations governing promotions. Keywords: Industrial Relations, Promotion Disputes, Labour Court, Legal Rights, Employee Grievance. |
Court |
Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
|
Entities Involved |
Hyderabad Development Authority
|
Judges |
Muhammad Sultan
|
Lawyers |
Syed Fasahat Hussain Rizvi
|
Petitioners |
Mushtak Ali Kazi
|
Respondents |
Hyderabad Development Authority through Director General, Civic Centre, Hyderabad
|
Citations |
1996 SLD 405,
1996 PLC 259
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
|
Sections |
25-A
|