Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 151351ca-a3f5-4a07-963f-2918f6e021c7
Body View case body.
Case Number Criminal Appeal No. 393 of 2015
Decision Date Jan 09, 2018
Hearing Date Jan 09, 2018
Decision The Supreme Court of Pakistan ruled in favor of the appellant, G.M. Niaz, acquitting him of the murder charge under Section 302(b) of the Penal Code. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. Key elements contributing to this decision included the lack of credible eyewitness testimony, the delayed filing of the First Information Report (FIR), and inconsistencies in the evidence presented. The appellant's conviction was set aside, and he was released from custody unless required in connection with other cases.
Summary In the case of Criminal Appeal No. 393 of 2015, the Supreme Court of Pakistan addressed a murder conviction under Section 302(b) of the Penal Code. G.M. Niaz, the appellant, was convicted of killing Zahid Iqbal at a tea stall, but the evidence presented was found insufficient to uphold the conviction. The court highlighted the absence of the tea stall staff as witnesses and the questionable credibility of the eyewitnesses, who were closely related to the deceased. Additionally, the delay in filing the FIR and the lack of blood-stained evidence further undermined the prosecution's case. Ultimately, the court granted the benefit of the doubt to the appellant, emphasizing the principle that a defendant must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This case underscores the critical importance of reliable evidence in criminal proceedings, particularly in serious charges like murder.
Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Entities Involved Not available
Judges ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN, MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL
Lawyers Hasnat Ahmed Khan, Muhammad Jaffar
Petitioners G. M. Niaz
Respondents THE STATE
Citations 2018 SLD 310, 2018 SCMR 506
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Sections 302(b)