| Case ID |
13e0096e-bb48-4ea3-882c-dae21cfa5003 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Moto Criminal Misc. No.212/M of 1992 |
| Decision Date |
Apr 28, 1992 |
| Hearing Date |
Apr 28, 1992 |
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court addressed the issue of non-execution of summonses and warrants in criminal cases. The court highlighted that over 92% of such processes remained unexecuted, which is a significant failure of the police department. The court expressed its concern over the negligence exhibited by the police, stating that it obstructs the course of justice, which is punishable under the law. While the court was inclined to take action against the police officials involved, it ultimately decided to pardon them based on their apologies and assurance of improved compliance in the future. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that all processes issued by the courts are executed efficiently to uphold the integrity of the judicial system. |
| Summary |
In the case of Moto Criminal Misc. No.212/M of 1992, the Lahore High Court scrutinized the alarming rate of non-execution of court processes, revealing that more than 92 out of every 100 summonses and warrants issued by trial courts were not executed. This situation reflects poorly on the efficiency and dedication of the police department. The court underscored that such negligence could lead to a complete breakdown of the administration of justice. The court summoned the District Magistrate and police officials to explain the delay in service of notices, leading to a discussion about accountability and the necessity for police to prioritize court orders. Ultimately, the court accepted the apologies of the police officials and directed that they take personal responsibility for ensuring that all court processes are executed effectively in the future. This case serves as a critical reminder of the essential role law enforcement plays in facilitating justice and upholding the rule of law. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Khalilur Rehman Ramday, J
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
STATE
|
| Respondents |
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUJRAT,
Mr. Masood Bungash, S.P. Gujrat,
Javed Iqbal, Inspector/SHO,
Mumtaz Hussain, ASI,
Muhammad Aslam, ASI/Muharrir,
Nasim Khalid, DFC 751 of P.S. Kharian,
Riaz Ahmad, Head Clerk, District Magistrates Office, Gujrat
|
| Citations |
1992 SLD 2020,
1992 PLJ 291
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|