| Case ID |
10b6a520-c042-481a-9c55-9780c82a8373 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Income Tax Case No.154 of 2005 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 08, 2005 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Sindh High Court ruled that expenditures incurred due to infraction of law should not be allowed as admissible deductions unless they are incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes. In this case, the court maintained that late delivery charges paid by the petitioner to Pioneer Cables Limited were not penalties for infraction of law but were legitimate business expenses, thus allowing the claim. The court emphasized that any extra payment made in compliance with administrative directions, rather than as a penalty for law violations, may qualify as business expenditure. The court also reaffirmed the principle that the nature of the payment must be evaluated based on the substance of the transaction rather than the nomenclature used to describe it. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the interpretation of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, particularly regarding the admissibility of certain deductions claimed by a public limited company, Bawany Metals Ltd. The company faced scrutiny over its claimed deductions for depreciation and late delivery charges, which were disallowed by the assessing officer. The court found that the late delivery charges, linked to a contractual obligation and not a violation of law, were legitimate business expenses. This case highlights the distinction between penalties and business expenses, emphasizing the need to assess the nature of payments based on the facts of each case. Legal principles established in prior cases were also referenced, reinforcing the notion that certain payments classified as penalties may still be allowable if they are deemed necessary for business operations. Overall, the ruling provides clarity on the treatment of expenditures in the context of the Income Tax Ordinance, potentially aiding businesses in navigating their tax obligations efficiently. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
|
| Judges |
MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI,
SAJJAD ALI SHAH
|
| Lawyers |
Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
|
| Petitioners |
COMMISSIONER (LEGAL DIVISION) LARGE TAXPAYERS UNIT, KARACHI
|
| Respondents |
BAWANY METALS LTD. KARACHI
|
| Citations |
2006 SLD 278,
2006 PTD 2256,
(2007) 95 TAX 17,
2007 PTR 14
|
| Other Citations |
1991 PTD 669,
PLD 2001 SC 201,
1999 PTD 3005
|
| Laws Involved |
Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
|
| Sections |
23,
136
|