Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0ffc9ad8-a7ae-4ccb-9452-6aa759234caf
Body View case body.
Case Number IT REFERENCE No. 650 OF 1972
Decision Date May 22, 1974
Hearing Date
Decision The Tribunal was justified in law in cancelling the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c). The assessee was not guilty of either fraud or gross or wilful neglect in returning its income. The ITO's rejection of the account books was based solely on the absence of a daily stock register, and there was no evidence to indicate that the assessee had understated sales or inflated expenses. The correct income was determined by applying a flat rate on the returned turnover, which did not constitute fraud or wilful neglect. As such, the penalty imposed was not justified.
Summary In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nawab and Brothers, the Allahabad High Court examined the applicability of penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court found that the Income Tax Officer (ITO) had rejected the assessee's account books due to the lack of a daily stock register, applying a flat rate to assess income. The Tribunal ruled that the assessee was not guilty of fraud, gross, or wilful neglect in reporting income, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. This case emphasizes the importance of substantiating claims of concealment or inaccurate particulars and highlights the legal presumption involved under section 271(1)(c) when reported income is significantly lower than assessed income. The case serves as a crucial reference point for similar tax disputes, particularly regarding the standards for imposing penalties in income tax cases.
Court Allahabad High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges Satish Chandra, H.N. Seth
Lawyers Deokinandan, S.B.L. Srivastava
Petitioners Commissioner of Income Tax
Respondents Nawab and Brothers
Citations 1977 SLD 1040, (1977) 107 ITR 681
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Income-tax Act, 1961
Sections 271(1)(c)