Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0fbed9d0-04e3-4b78-a10e-f03e7b7b7523
Body View case body.
Case Number F.A.O. No. 155 of 2005
Decision Date Jun 28, 2006
Hearing Date Jun 28, 2006
Decision The Lahore High Court allowed the appeal against the order of the Banking Court, which had dismissed the application for setting aside an ex parte decree. The court found that the ex parte decree was invalid as it was passed without complying with the mandatory service requirements stipulated in section 9(5) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001. The court emphasized that proper service must be made through all prescribed modes, including summons, registered post, and newspaper publication. Since the defendants were not properly served, the decree was declared void and set aside, allowing the defendants to defend their case.
Summary This case involves a dispute between Hussan Ara and others against the Bank of Punjab regarding a loan recovery suit. The Banking Court had issued an ex parte decree due to the defendants' failure to appear. However, the Lahore High Court found that the service of summons was not properly executed according to the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, which necessitates multiple modes of service. The court ruled that the lack of adequate service violated the principles of natural justice, making the ex parte decree void. The High Court directed that all future summons must be issued in accordance with the prescribed legal standards to ensure fairness in judicial proceedings.
Court Lahore High Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR ARSHAD
Lawyers Ch. Manzoor-ul-Haq, Muhammad Shakil Chaudhry
Petitioners 8 others, HUSSAN ARA
Respondents BANK OF PUNJAB through Manager
Citations 2006 SLD 2956, 2006 CLD 1502
Other Citations PLD 2002 SC 101, PLJ 2005 SC 709
Laws Involved Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, Civil Procedure Code, 1908
Sections 9(5)