| Case ID |
0f9b9e01-782e-4109-a7c2-b812fb61f449 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Customs Appeal No. 1 of 1997 |
| Decision Date |
Dec 08, 1998 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Lahore Bench) dated 23-09-1997 was set aside. The classification of the imported chemicals, Tetrapropylene Benzene Sulphonic Acid, was determined to be under PCT heading 29.03, allowing for a 10% sales tax assessment. The court found that the Customs Authorities had not adequately followed legal formalities in drawing samples for classification. The report from the Customs Cooperation Council in Brussels was deemed unreliable due to a lack of evidence demonstrating that proper procedures were followed during sample collection. The judgment emphasized the need for subjective examination of the goods in question, reaffirming that the Customs Authorities are obliged to apply their own judgment rather than relying solely on external opinions. |
| Summary |
This case revolves around the classification of Tetrapropylene Benzene Sulphonic Acid under the Customs Act and the appropriate PCT heading for taxation purposes. The Sindh High Court reviewed the appeal following a decision from the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appellants argued that their chemicals were misclassified, leading to an unjust tax assessment. The court highlighted the importance of subjective examination of the consignment ingredients, asserting that the Customs Authorities must adhere to legal protocols when classifying goods. The ruling underscored the necessity for transparency and adherence to established procedures, particularly when external reports are involved. The decision has implications for future classifications under the Customs Act, emphasizing the need for due diligence by authorities in assessing imported goods. Key terms include Customs Act, classification, Tetrapropylene Benzene Sulphonic Acid, PCT heading, subjective examination, and Customs Cooperation Council. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Dada Soap Factory,
Collector of Customs Appraisement
|
| Judges |
Nazim Hussain Siddiqui,
Ghulam Nabi Soomro
|
| Lawyers |
Javed Mazhar,
Muhammad Nasim,
S. Tariq Ali
|
| Petitioners |
Messrs Dada Soap Factory
|
| Respondents |
Collector of Customs Appraisement
|
| Citations |
1999 SLD 864 = 1999 CLC 762
|
| Other Citations |
PLD 1984 Kar. 302
|
| Laws Involved |
Customs Act
|
| Sections |
4,
18
|