Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0ba48a1c-6c0a-4ef5-ac95-df34a7f621cc
Body View case body.
Case Number KAR-185 of 1984
Decision Date Feb 04, 1985
Hearing Date Feb 04, 1985
Decision The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, Moula Bakhsh. The Labour Court had previously reinstated him but denied back benefits on the grounds of leaving without permission. The Appellate Tribunal found that the circumstances of the case, particularly the urgent need to attend to his seriously ill son, justified his actions. It was ruled that the refusal of back benefits was unwarranted, and the appellant was awarded back benefits equivalent to his basic salary of Rs. 6951 per month.
Summary This case revolves around the reinstatement and back benefits of a workman, Moula Bakhsh, who left his duty without permission due to a family emergency involving his seriously ill son. The Labour Court initially reinstated him but denied back benefits, citing absence without permission. However, the Labour Appellate Tribunal recognized the urgency of the situation and ruled that the workman's departure was not deliberate but rather a necessary response to a crisis. This decision underscores the importance of compassionate considerations in employment law and the rights of workers to address family emergencies.
Court Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Entities Involved Pakistan Machine Tool Factory
Judges Ali Nawaz Budhani
Lawyers Khadim Hussain, Iqbal Afridi
Petitioners Moula Bakhsh
Respondents Messrs Pakistan Machine Tool Factory
Citations 1985 SLD 2258, 1985 PLC 966
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
Sections 25-A, 38(3)