Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0b908262-f936-49b5-9cfc-ef9b5c27b8c4
Body View case body.
Case Number Appeal No. 249(I) of 1988
Decision Date Mar 22, 1992
Hearing Date
Decision The appeal was dismissed as incompetent under Section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. The civil servant's appeal did not show against which order he had filed an appeal, and the earlier order of promotion regarding the respondent had been withdrawn retrospectively. Both the civil servant and the respondent were placed in the same grade, but the appeal did not challenge any existing order related to seniority. Moreover, as there was no final order passed, it was not possible to determine the starting point for the limitation period, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of a cause of grievance.
Summary In the case of Riaz Ahmad vs. WAPDA, the Federal Service Tribunal addressed a civil servant's appeal regarding seniority against a respondent. The decision emphasized the importance of presenting a valid challenge to existing orders within the framework of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973. The Tribunal concluded that without a specific order being contested, the appeal was rendered incompetent. The ruling underlined the necessity for civil servants to substantiate their grievances with clear references to relevant orders, thereby reinforcing procedural integrity in administrative justice. This case highlights the critical nature of adhering to established legal protocols when seeking redress in service tribunals, ensuring that appeals are grounded in substantive claims rather than procedural ambiguities.
Court Federal Service Tribunal
Entities Involved WAPDA
Judges CH. HASAN NAWAZ, MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Lawyers Hamid Khan for Appellant, Ch. Ghulam Hasan Gulshan with Muhammad Ejaz, Legal Assistant for WAPDA
Petitioners RIAZ AHMAD
Respondents
Citations 1992 SLD 1241, 1992 PLC 1351
Other Citations 1992 P L C (C.S.) 1351
Laws Involved Service Tribunals Act
Sections 4