| Case ID |
0b854377-e4b6-46c3-8ee2-8d2f7503e3e0 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Criminal Revision Application No. 134 of 1969 |
| Decision Date |
Mar 22, 1971 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The revision application was dismissed on the basis that the learned Magistrate did not err in law. The Magistrate relied on the examination of the complainant and her witnesses, the police report, and the history of disputes between the parties. The learned Additional District Magistrate confirmed that the allegations were not established based on the evidence presented, and there was no merit in the grounds raised by the applicant's counsel regarding the independence of the Magistrate's judgment. |
| Summary |
In the case of Mst. Dilbari Begum vs. The State and Others, the Sindh High Court examined a revision application concerning the dismissal of a complaint under section 203. The applicant, Mst. Dilbari Begum, claimed possession of a disputed plot and alleged theft of property. The court highlighted the importance of evidence and the role of prior disputes in evaluating the case. The decision underscored the necessity for independent judgment by the magistrate, affirming that the dismissal of the complaint was justified based on the investigation and witness statements. The ruling emphasizes the legal principles surrounding disputes, evidence assessment, and the role of the judiciary in resolving conflicts. Keywords such as 'dispute resolution', 'evidence assessment', 'legal principles', and 'judicial independence' are critical for understanding the implications of this ruling. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
GHIDALN RASOOL K. SHAIKH, J
|
| Lawyers |
Not available
|
| Petitioners |
Mst. Dilbari Begum
|
| Respondents |
The State,
3 Others
|
| Citations |
1972 SLD 773,
1972 PCRLJ 307
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|