| Case ID |
0b05e807-1c09-4781-8605-c29fbff7b340 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Cr. Misc. Application No. 261 of 2014 |
| Decision Date |
Aug 15, 2016 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The Sindh High Court, presided over by Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 261 of 2014 filed by petitioner Syed Mohammad Ali Raza Zaidi. The petitioner sought to quash the proceedings under section 561-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, arguing that his inclusion as an accused was unjustified and lacked legal basis. The court examined the merits of the application, noting that the trial court had appropriately found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on the evidence presented. The petitioner's claims were deemed insufficient to warrant the dismissal of the charges, especially given the specific allegations of illegal gratification and wrongful confinement. The court emphasized the importance of allowing the trial to proceed to its natural conclusion unless exceptional circumstances justified intervention. Consequently, the application to quash the proceedings was denied, and the charges against the petitioner were upheld. |
| Summary |
In the landmark decision of Cr. Misc. Application No. 261 of 2014, the Sindh High Court, adjudicated by Justice Syed Muhammad Farooq Shah, ruled on a pivotal case involving allegations of corruption and illegal gratification. The petitioner, Syed Mohammad Ali Raza Zaidi, challenged his inclusion as an accused under section 561-A of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), asserting that the proceedings against him were unfounded and lacked substantial evidence. The case revolved around serious accusations that included demands for bribes and wrongful confinement orchestrated by police officials to manipulate legal outcomes. The petitioner contended that his name was unjustly included in the charge sheet despite the absence of concrete evidence linking him to the alleged crimes. He further argued that the investigation was marred by malpractices and intentional concealment of facts aimed at exonerating him without just cause. The defense emphasized legal precedents where the inclusion of an accused must be substantiated by indisputable evidence and that procedural lapses could warrant the dismissal of charges. Conversely, the prosecution, represented by Saleem Akhter, maintained that the trial court had correctly identified a prima facie case based on the material on record, justifying the continuation of the trial. They highlighted the complexity of corruption cases and the necessity of thorough judicial scrutiny to uphold the rule of law. The court meticulously analyzed both arguments, reiterating the judiciary's commitment to ensuring that justice is served without prejudice. It was underscored that the trial court's discretion in proceeding with the case was within its authority, especially when faced with credible allegations supported by evidence. The High Court ultimately decided to uphold the trial court's decision, dismissing the petitioner's application to quash the proceedings. This judgment reinforces the judicial system's stance against corruption and underscores the importance of maintaining rigorous standards of evidence and procedure in criminal cases. The case serves as a significant reference for future litigations involving allegations of misconduct and the critical examination required to uphold legal integrity. Keywords such as 'Sindh High Court decision', 'Criminal Procedure Code', 'corruption allegations', 'illegal gratification', and 'judicial integrity' are central to this case, reflecting trending legal topics and ensuring high visibility in legal discourse and online searches. |
| Court |
Sindh High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Umar Daraz,
Misri Khan,
SI Raja Khalid,
ASI Tanveer,
ASI Rizwan,
ASI Qaseem Qureshi,
Inspector Ali Raza,
Deputy Director (Legal), ACE, Karachi,
Special Judge, Anti-Corruption
|
| Judges |
SYED MUHAMMAD FAROOQ SHAH
|
| Lawyers |
Muhammad Farooq,
Saleem Akhter
|
| Petitioners |
SYED MOHAMMAD ALI RAZA ZAIDI
|
| Respondents |
THE STATE
|
| Citations |
2017 SLD 2694,
2017 PCRLJ 1083
|
| Other Citations |
Inayatullah and 4 others v. The State 1999 PCr.LJ 731 rel.,
Falak Sher and another v. The State PLD 1967 SC 425 rel.,
Muhammad Akber v. The State and another reported as 1972 SCMR 335,
Naseebullah and another v. The State (PLD 1986 Karachi 417),
S. Mateen-ur-Rehman v. The State (2004 YLR 2101),
Muhammad Abbasi v. SHO Bhara Kohu and 7 others (PLD 2010 SC 969),
Bashir Ahmed v. Zafar-ul-Islam and others (PLD 2004 SC 298)
|
| Laws Involved |
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860,
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
|
| Sections |
173,
190,
193,
249A,
561A,
34,
161,
343,
5(2)
|