| Case ID |
0af4cc24-7a9e-428d-8084-ae7ade1c0c54 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
IT REFERENCE No. 88 OF 1970 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 01, 1979 |
| Hearing Date |
|
| Decision |
The case addressed several questions regarding the allowability of business expenditures and losses under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was held that expenditures incurred by the assessee in prosecuting income-tax appeals were incidental to business and allowed as deductions. The Tribunal's decision to classify losses on the disposal of Government securities as business losses was affirmed, emphasizing that these actions were integral to the business operations of the assessee. The court also examined the powers of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the computation of penal interest and concluded that such computations are not subject to appeal. Overall, the decision supported the assessee's claims, allowing deductions for specific expenditures and losses incurred in the course of business operations. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case before the Bombay High Court, the core issues revolved around the interpretation of the Income-tax Act, 1961, particularly concerning the deductibility of business expenditures and the treatment of losses incurred in the disposal of Government securities. The court ruled that expenses related to income-tax appeals are indeed business expenditures that can be deducted, emphasizing the principle of commercial expediency. Furthermore, the court clarified the limits of appellate jurisdiction regarding penal interest, asserting that while liabilities can be challenged, the computation of such interest falls outside the scope of appeal processes. This case serves as a critical reference for understanding business deductions and the nuances of tax law, providing clarity on how courts may view business-related financial decisions. Keywords such as 'Income-tax deductions', 'Business losses', 'Commercial expediency', and 'Tax law interpretations' are pertinent for SEO optimization in legal contexts. |
| Court |
Bombay High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
Chandurkar,
Desai
|
| Lawyers |
R.J. Joshi,
V.J. Pandit,
Miss S.G. Shah,
D.H. Dwarkadas,
S.J. Mehta,
N.V. Mehta
|
| Petitioners |
Commissioner of Income Tax
|
| Respondents |
Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd
|
| Citations |
1979 SLD 1212,
(1979) 119 ITR 595
|
| Other Citations |
Birla Cotton Spg. & Wvg. Mills Ltd. v. CIT [1967] 64 ITR 568 (Cal.),
Keshardeo Shrinivas Morarka v. CIT [1965] 56 ITR 269 (Bom.),
Mathuradas B. Mohta v. CIT [1962] 45 ITR 107 (Bom.),
S.D. Sharma v. CIT [1962] 45 ITR 107 (Bom.),
CIT v. Daimler Benz A.G. [1977] 108 ITR 961 (Bom.)(FB)
|
| Laws Involved |
Income-tax Act, 1961
|
| Sections |
37(1),
28(i),
251,
215
|