Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 0ab99559-db50-4543-b0b4-790c4f4579f0
Body View case body.
Case Number KAR-757 of 1980
Decision Date Nov 26, 1980
Hearing Date Nov 26, 1980
Decision The Labour Appellate Tribunal found no merit in the application for suo motu revision as the Labour Court had adequately addressed the issue of back benefits. The Tribunal noted that the Labour Court's decision was clear and discussed the issue of back benefits, awarding a specific sum to the informant. The Tribunal concluded that the informant's claims were unfounded and did not warrant revisional powers under the circumstances presented.
Summary This case revolves around the application for suo motu revision filed by Abdul Sattar, a former employee of Gul Ahmad Textile Mills, concerning a Labour Court decision. The Tribunal reviewed the Labour Court's order which set aside Sattar's termination but did not award back benefits. The Tribunal clarified that the Labour Court had indeed addressed the issue of back benefits, awarding a specific amount for a limited duration. The absence of statutory provisions requiring back benefits upon reinstatement was highlighted, leading to the conclusion that the Labour Court's decision was justified. This case underscores the importance of clear legal provisions regarding worker rights and the discretion of Labour Courts in awarding benefits. The decision reinforces the necessity for claimants to present solid grounds for revision applications in labour disputes.
Court Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh
Entities Involved Gul Ahmad Textile Mills
Judges Z. A. CHANNA, ABDUL SATTAR
Lawyers Abdul Ghaffar
Petitioners Abdul Sattar
Respondents MSSERS GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS
Citations 1981 SLD 2370, 1981 PLC 721
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
Sections 38 (3-a)