Case ID |
08e58aae-45b4-47bf-90da-372dd38d5670 |
Body |
View case body. Login to View |
Case Number |
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45 of 2016 |
Decision Date |
Aug 04, 2016 |
Hearing Date |
Aug 04, 2016 |
Decision |
The petition for cancellation of bail was dismissed due to insufficient grounds to withdraw the concession of bail. The court found that the offenses were not compoundable under the Anti-Terrorism Act and that the petitioners had raised no compelling arguments that would persuade the court to exercise discretion in their favor. The court reiterated that very strong and exceptional grounds are required to revoke bail once granted by a competent court. |
Summary |
In the case of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45 of 2016, the court addressed the petition for cancellation of bail for the respondents who were accused of serious offenses, including terrorism-related crimes under the Anti Terrorism Act, and various sections of the Penal Code. The court emphasized the strict requirements for cancelling bail, noting that the State's arguments were insufficient to warrant such action. This case highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of the bail process within the criminal justice system, particularly in cases involving potential terrorism. The ruling is significant for legal practitioners navigating the complexities of bail applications in similar contexts. Key terms include bail cancellation, terrorism, and criminal procedure. |
Court |
Unknown Court
|
Entities Involved |
Not available
|
Judges |
MALIK HAQ NAWAZ, JUSTICE,
SAHIB KHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE
|
Lawyers |
Dy. A.G.,
Arif Nazeer
|
Petitioners |
THE STATE
|
Respondents |
SABIR,
ABDUR RAHMAN,
FAIZ ALI,
SHAHBAZ ALI,
AMIR HAYAT,
SADIQ SHAH,
SHAH RAEES KHAN,
PAKHTOON WALI,
AKHON ABBAS,
AIN ALI SHAH,
MUSSA
|
Citations |
2018 SLD 567,
2018 MLD 577
|
Other Citations |
Not available
|
Laws Involved |
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898),
Penal Code (XLV of 1860),
Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
|
Sections |
497(5),
324,
506(2),
147,
149,
109,
6,
7
|