Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 08e58aae-45b4-47bf-90da-372dd38d5670
Body View case body.
Case Number Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45 of 2016
Decision Date Aug 04, 2016
Hearing Date Aug 04, 2016
Decision The petition for cancellation of bail was dismissed due to insufficient grounds to withdraw the concession of bail. The court found that the offenses were not compoundable under the Anti-Terrorism Act and that the petitioners had raised no compelling arguments that would persuade the court to exercise discretion in their favor. The court reiterated that very strong and exceptional grounds are required to revoke bail once granted by a competent court.
Summary In the case of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45 of 2016, the court addressed the petition for cancellation of bail for the respondents who were accused of serious offenses, including terrorism-related crimes under the Anti Terrorism Act, and various sections of the Penal Code. The court emphasized the strict requirements for cancelling bail, noting that the State's arguments were insufficient to warrant such action. This case highlights the importance of maintaining the integrity of the bail process within the criminal justice system, particularly in cases involving potential terrorism. The ruling is significant for legal practitioners navigating the complexities of bail applications in similar contexts. Key terms include bail cancellation, terrorism, and criminal procedure.
Court Unknown Court
Entities Involved Not available
Judges MALIK HAQ NAWAZ, JUSTICE, SAHIB KHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE
Lawyers Dy. A.G., Arif Nazeer
Petitioners THE STATE
Respondents SABIR, ABDUR RAHMAN, FAIZ ALI, SHAHBAZ ALI, AMIR HAYAT, SADIQ SHAH, SHAH RAEES KHAN, PAKHTOON WALI, AKHON ABBAS, AIN ALI SHAH, MUSSA
Citations 2018 SLD 567, 2018 MLD 577
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
Sections 497(5), 324, 506(2), 147, 149, 109, 6, 7