| Case ID |
08b5ccf6-9002-440f-a92d-83ff7619300b |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
I.C.As. Nos. 505, 506, 554, 555 & 556 of 2000, in |
| Decision Date |
Mar 04, 2004 |
| Hearing Date |
Feb 18, 2004 |
| Decision |
The Lahore High Court dismissed the Intra Court Appeals (ICAs) Nos. 505/2000, 506/2000, 554/2000, 555/2000, and 556/2000, ruling that the retrospective validation of the Price Equalization Surcharge was intra vires the Legislature. The appellants had challenged the imposition of a price differential on imported iron strips, asserting that the levy constituted a tax, which only the Legislature could impose. The court found that the provisions of the Import of Goods (Price Equalization Surcharge) Act, 1967, validated the notifications issued prior to its enforcement, thus upholding the government's authority. The judgment emphasized the legislative intent behind retrospective application and the authority of the Legislature to enact such laws. The court concluded that the appellants did not provide sufficient grounds to warrant interference with the prior judgments and that the existing law permitted the actions taken by the government. |
| Summary |
In the landmark case of M/s MODEL STEEL MILLS LIMITED vs. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, the Lahore High Court addressed critical issues surrounding the retrospective application of tax laws, specifically focusing on the Import of Goods (Price Equalization Surcharge) Act, 1967. The appellants contested a price differential imposed on their imported goods, arguing it constituted an unlawful tax. The court, however, upheld the government's actions, affirming that the Legislature had the authority to enact laws with retrospective effect. This case is pivotal in understanding the boundaries between executive powers and legislative authority in Pakistan, particularly in taxation matters. The decision reinforces the principle that legislative bodies can validate executive actions retroactively, thereby safeguarding the government's revenue collection mechanisms. Legal practitioners and scholars studying tax law and legislative authority will find this case essential for its implications on the interpretation of statutory provisions and the retrospective validation of actions taken prior to the enactment of relevant laws. |
| Court |
Lahore High Court
|
| Entities Involved |
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN,
MODEL STEEL MILLS LIMITED
|
| Judges |
TASSADUQ Hussain Jilani,
Parvez Ahmad
|
| Lawyers |
Mr. A.K. Dogar, Advocate,
Mian Nisar Ahmad, Advocate,
Mr. Sher Zaman Khan, D.A.G.
|
| Petitioners |
M/s MODEL STEEL MILLS LIMITED
|
| Respondents |
2 others,
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
|
| Citations |
2004 SLD 3519,
2004 PLJ 1287
|
| Other Citations |
PLD 1966 SC 357,
1984 CLC 227,
PLD 1974 SC 151,
PLD 1989 SC 26,
PLD 1966 Lahore 22,
2003 SCMR 271,
PLD 2001 SC 607,
1996 SCMR 237,
2000 SCMR 112,
PLD 2002 SC 206,
1985 CLC 300,
PLD 1965 SC 681,
PLD 1966 SC 362,
PLD 1974 Karachi 254
|
| Laws Involved |
Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972,
Import of Goods (Price Equalization Surcharge) Act, 1967
|
| Sections |
3,
7
|