| Case ID |
0890ecd3-cf7b-43ac-81d6-8c790fa85789 |
| Body |
View case body. Login to View |
| Case Number |
Appeal No. 134(K)(C.S) of 2001 |
| Decision Date |
Feb 20, 2003 |
| Hearing Date |
Feb 19, 2003 |
| Decision |
The Tribunal found that the appellant was unjustly denied Selection Grade based on a non-recommendation in his ACR for 1995, despite being promoted as a Sub-Engineer (Grade-I) in 2001. The decision directed the respondents to reconsider the appellant's case for Selection Grade in light of his promotion, emphasizing the need for fairness and rectification of any mistakes made by the authorities. The appeal was admitted, and the Tribunal ordered that the case be reviewed in the next Departmental Selection Committee meeting within three months. |
| Summary |
This case highlights the complexities surrounding civil service promotions and the implications of ACR recommendations. The appellant, Malik Abdul Rauf, faced a denial for Selection Grade due to a non-recommendation in his ACR, despite being promoted subsequently. The Tribunal's ruling underlines the importance of ensuring that civil servants receive their rightful benefits, especially when there are inconsistencies in their promotion history. The decision calls for a review of the appellant's case by the Departmental Selection Committee, aiming to rectify any potential injustices. This case serves as a pivotal reference for future civil service disputes, especially concerning promotion and selection criteria. |
| Court |
Federal Service Tribunal
|
| Entities Involved |
Not available
|
| Judges |
AKBAR M. MEMON,
NAZAR MUHAMMAD SHAIKH
|
| Lawyers |
Sanaullah Noor Ghouri,
Niaz A. Khan,
Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed
|
| Petitioners |
Malik ABDUL RAUF
|
| Respondents |
others,
THE ENGINEER INCHIEF, BRANCH GHQ, RAWALPINDI
|
| Citations |
2005 SLD 878,
2005 PLC 360
|
| Other Citations |
Not available
|
| Laws Involved |
Not available
|
| Sections |
Not available
|