Legal Case Summary

Case Details
Case ID 04d0f7f9-5d4e-49f4-bdf9-f8f2ebe052f8
Body View case body.
Case Number Appeal No. 390(L) of 1988
Decision Date Jan 31, 1989
Hearing Date Dec 27, 1988
Decision The appeal was dismissed as time-barred because it was filed more than thirty days after the communication of the rejection of the departmental appeal. The appellant failed to provide substantial reasons for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal, resulting in the dismissal in limine.
Summary In the case of Appeal No. 390(L) of 1988, the Federal Service Tribunal addressed the matter of a railway employee who was reverted from the post of Stenographer (BPS-15) to Stenotypist (BPS-12) for six months due to disciplinary actions. The employee filed a departmental appeal which was rejected, and subsequently, the appeal to the tribunal was filed after the statutory period, leading to its dismissal. This case highlights the importance of adhering to the timelines set forth in the Limitation Act and the necessity of providing valid justifications for any delay in filing appeals. Understanding the nuances of the Railway Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules and the Service Tribunals Act is crucial for legal professionals dealing with employment law, and it emphasizes the need for prompt action in challenging administrative decisions. This case serves as a reference for future disputes regarding the efficiency and discipline of railway employees, and it underscores the judicial perspective on time constraints in legal proceedings.
Court Federal Service Tribunal
Entities Involved Pakistan Railways
Judges CH. HASSAN NAWAZ, KH. ABDUL JALIL, MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Lawyers Muhammad Aslam, Nemo
Petitioners Muhammad Aslam
Respondents others, THE GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Citations 1989 SLD 2214, 1989 PLC 472
Other Citations Not available
Laws Involved Railway Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Limitation Act (IX of 1908)
Sections 5, 6, 4, 5